cam stuff.

April 4th, 2003

how can less than 1000 people voting come up with a MAJORITY of 6000 members?

WTF?

do they really think we’re that stupid?

5 Responses to “cam stuff.”

whethergal

April 4th, 2003 - 8:53 am

Not a majority of members.

*hugs*

Hiya Mike daaaahling.

(Hey look! I didn’t call you Mikey! *edges toward the window*)

bladededge

April 4th, 2003 - 9:13 am

Well, either way, we have to go with it. It’s been told to me numerous times that it’s over, done, and there’s nothing we can do to change it. Even though a well respected member of the Cam, say our local DC, was unable to vote because he couldn’t get the link to work. I wonder how many others there are out there that had that problem?

thumper341

April 4th, 2003 - 10:14 am

No but everyone was given enough time to vote and I got ore than enough messages that voting was open and I’m on a single OOC list.

I don’t think anyones stupid…..

Apathetic and other terms come to mind however

sithrose

April 4th, 2003 - 10:29 am

I DO think that it would be a majority of voting members. If you exercise your right not to vote, you have no rights to bitch about the results of said vote.

Not so sure about the stupid, since they published the numbers of votes too. In what math does a two to one ratio not equal a majority of votes cast?

Or, more appropriately - You can’t count a vote that wasn’t cast.

tsal

April 17th, 2003 - 4:26 am

Hell, it’s been so long since I’ve used latin, I’m not sure if my spelling is correct.

Anyways, I wasn’t meaning that to attack anyone, I was just frustrated that something that affects so many people was just kinda blown off..

Some folks, btw, couldn’t get the link to work.. so.. not everyone COULD vote. I’m not saying it would have changed the results much, only 3 people have said anything to that effect, but still..

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.